commodorified: A cartoon of a worried looking woman in a chef's hat (cooking for people who don't)
[personal profile] commodorified
Solicit or offer ideas, cheer each other on, ask for or offer data or resources, team up and do a group-authored post or a mini-carnival cluster of posts, find a beta, be a beta ...

I would like to say: I am not at all worried about avoiding duplication, and suggest that nobody else be either.

If eight people do posts on How To Cook Eggs, they will all be different, they will all be right and useful, and each of them will be somebody's absolute most useful and favourite post of the whole carnival.

Carry on!

Date: 2011-12-18 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] bemused_leftist
The slow cooker is a good solution for some of those problems (one pot meal, cleans out easily).

What is the advantage of a slow cooker over a microwave set on LOWEST or DEFROST? Giving the microwave timer another twist every once in a while is not a problem, and a slow cook recipe can rest in the microwave between times.

Date: 2011-12-18 02:38 am (UTC)
0jack: Closeup of Boba Fett's helmet, angular orange stripe surrounding a narrow window on a greenish metallic field. (Default)
From: [personal profile] 0jack
(a) I find that meats and beans cook far better in the slow cooker. Something about the way the microwave heats things up, maybe?
(b) I don't have to attend the slow cooker, I can leave it on all day and go out of the house, etc. I also use it overnight for cooked cereal or a hot meal to be packed for lunches.
(c) I don't have to stir or anything like that either. Also, it doesn't boil over, which is (for me) a hazard of cooking large liquid dishes in the microwave. I will note here that I have terrible attention issues sometimes and if I were using a microwave, I'd never finish cooking most stuff.
(d) The food stays at a steady temperature for many hours if I don't get to it, making it safer.
(e) I can cook a lot more in the slow cooker than I can fit in my microwave, which is a consideration when cooking for a number of people but not for one or maybe two.
(f) I don't know how the microwave would handle cooking something like a whole small chicken from the frozen state.

Downside, slow cooker is an expense not always proportionate to the use people get from it, even if it comes cheap. Though you can get a mini slow cooker, it still may be too big for what a single person needs, making it inefficient. Also, it is not going to be as fast as a microwave for cooking many things. It's another thing to store, which is a pain in the ass.

I consider it an extra for most kitchens but not for the way I cook personally these days—it interfaces with my use of the freezer and my "cook ahead" strategy for dealing with the ups and downs of my energy levels. Back in the basement days, I would have bought a deep electric skillet before a slow cooker. I had to live out of a hotel after I had my daughter and she was in the NICU and the electric skillet saved my sanity.

Profile

commodorified: My hair, flying in the wind, and my right arm, in sunlight (Default)
commodorified

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 22nd, 2014 03:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios