This is where you need specifically Rivers of London canon knowledge, but because of its and its watershed's size and volume/wildness, both of which would confer significant power, plus the presumed vast age of said genus locii and their comparative lack of interaction with large numbers of pre- or -post invasion humanity.
ETA: I mean, the Thames, in a London- or at least UK- centred fictional universe, is quite properly a Very Big Deal. Once I get to trying to superimpose those assumptions on my own native landscape, some things just sort of ... jump out, and that's one.
Now working out if lakes have genus locii or not. If they do, my villians have accidentally bitten off not just more than they can chew, but a piece of a steak which is still attached to an animal capable of eating both of them and bawling for dessert.
The Thames and the Fraser are in some sense about the same age -- 10,000 years, more or less -- because they're both post-glacial rivers. But yes, more water and many fewer people.
(The Mississippi gets vast age. It's interesting to imagine what waking up the Deh-Cho/Kuukpak/MacKenzie would do, even if it is also post-glacially young.)
I'd never heard of that film! I looked it up on IMDB and WorldCat, though, and it looks like my chances of being able to watch it are slim to none (a couple of relatively local university libraries have it, but I have no access to those libraries, and ILL doesn't stretch to DVDs, alas). Sigh.
I had the deeply amusing experience last winter of hiking up a very rough hillside in the far northern part of the state...very remote, etc etc...and looking down into the Fraser valley. At a Target.
I'm seeing a couple of quasi-Latin phrases being floated around this thread, and I'm pretty sure they're all attempts at the same expression, none of them quite on target. Genius loci is Latin for "spirit of a/the place". The first word is the same one we took into English to describe people like Isaac Newton, Marie Curie, and Albert Einstein: "genius" (not "genus", which means "tribe, type, kind"). The second is the genitive (possessive) form of "locus", meaning "place", and has only one "i": "loci". It looks and sounds the same as the plural form. But if you want to pluralize the phrase it's "genii loci", "spirits of place", for the same reason why the English plural is not "spirit of places".
Respectfully submitted, Dr. Whom Consulting Linguist, Grammarian, Orthoëpist, and Philological Busybody
The term is a direct draw from Ben Aaronovitch's Rivers of London series. I'm afraid you'll have to take that up with Detective Chief Inspector Nightingale [g].
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
commodorified) wrote2015-11-28 09:21 pm
no subject
And why the Fraser in particular? Because it's undammed and so plausibly wild?
no subject
ETA: I mean, the Thames, in a London- or at least UK- centred fictional universe, is quite properly a Very Big Deal. Once I get to trying to superimpose those assumptions on my own native landscape, some things just sort of ... jump out, and that's one.
Now working out if lakes have genus locii or not. If they do, my villians have accidentally bitten off not just more than they can chew, but a piece of a steak which is still attached to an animal capable of eating both of them and bawling for dessert.
no subject
(The Mississippi gets vast age. It's interesting to imagine what waking up the Deh-Cho/Kuukpak/MacKenzie would do, even if it is also post-glacially young.)
no subject
no subject
HAHAHAHAHA YEAH.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And one of my favourites on there is "The log driver's waltz".
no subject
no subject
What a wonderful thought. I wonder if the serial numbers would file off sufficiently.
no subject
no subject
Canadians, man.
The Doctor offers an observation
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Whom
Consulting Linguist, Grammarian, Orthoëpist, and Philological Busybody
Re: The Doctor offers an observation