(no subject)
Oct. 31st, 2012 01:42 amSo, seriously, when did it start to be socially acceptable and even normal to greet the news of someone's death by convening an inquiry on the spot to decide whether they "deserve" sympathy or not?
Ok, actually, forget that question. how do we make it stop?
Ok, actually, forget that question. how do we make it stop?
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 06:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:08 am (UTC)2) More like 'arguably by their own fault' - the world is full of people who will cheerfully - literally - tell you all about deaths that take place in the course of activities they do not themselves understand.
3a) Had Nixon died in a horrible accident I wouldn't have mourned him, but I wouldn't have gone around announcing that anyone who does X activity deserves what they get, either.
3b) Actually, having cheerfully excoriated Nixon, frex, up one side and down the other for *years*, I was okay with taking a few days off so his friends and family could bury him. If someone is genuinely vile, there's relatively little chance they're gong to completely rehabilitate themselves by kicking the bucket. I don't much go for nil nisi bonum</>, but that ought properly to apply to serious evaluations of a person's legacy, not games of "let's make the mourners feel even WORSE."
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:43 am (UTC)ETA: Though do give some thought as to how and why you got from "why have people apparently completely forgotten how to act in the face of tragedy and death" to "But POL POT!" in one step?
Whataboutery is bad for the general discourse and for the blood pressure, both.