Get thee to a Lesbian Seperatist Commune, err, Nunnery?

[commodorified]

Oh, Benny The Rat.

Pope Says American Nuns Too Focused On Poor, Not Enough On Gay Bashing.

Also, Commenters Not To Be, from this story

Hey in the US no one is entitles to any maternity leave - count your self lucky.

Thanks, I won't.

Comments

[commodorified]

I am entirely fine with this, it's interesting and I think important. I am about to encourage my friend horsetraveller to pop over this side and join in.

I don't know offhand what the legalities are around surrogacy in Canada at the moment, beyond the fact that Maternity leave is specifically for late pregnancy/recovery from birth whereas Parental Leave exists for and can be split amongst the people of whatever sex parenting the baby. I don't know what happens about adoption paperwork; I suspect practically it vanishes into it taking 6 weeks for EI to start paying your leave regardless.

I suspect that the same problem exists wrt surrogacy, as you do have to be a legal parent to take parental leave: the fact that you can almost certainly take unpaid leave for any situation involving 'sudden infant in household' and then when the paperwork does go through you can take the paid leave as if it were adoption, because parental leave doesn't apply only to infants, it applies per kid, almost certainly helps.

I find the hypothetical knickertwisting of Disgusted in Toryville somewhat hard to account for as 'omg too many people involved in one child's beginnings' just makes me blink as a form of fraud,but perhaps adopters and parents who used surrogates could have unpaid leave with the understanding that it converts to paid the day the papers go through?

[legionseagle]

This is the Government leaflet dealing with the UK position. Note the differences, incidentally, between maternity leave, paternity leave and maternity pay; it's all rather hideously complicated and here are the details on pay.

[legionseagle]

Oh, and this is the Hansard transcript of the woman in question's MP putting the request for an amendment bill to deal with the question to Parliament on 17 April 2012 - that is, three days before Care2Causes put the story up - without mentioning this - as evidence of a 'War on Women'. Note Healey's explanation for the background of the lacuna.

[nineveh_uk]

Oh dear. I've just read the MPs' question. I shall take the charitable view that he hasn't thought through what he is saying, but it does confirm my feeling that the soft issue of [maternity] leave was potentially being used as a means to push for legalisation of surrogacy.

[nineveh_uk]

I mean by legalisation "pre-birth agreements enforcable through criminal law".

[legionseagle]

Yes, I saw that, but I think he may have been just handwaving a bit.

[legionseagle]

I think that's probably true, but it's certainly clear that the MPs don't seem to have any objection to giving some form of maternity rights to parents in these circumstances.

Care2Causes still misrepresenting it, I see, but though they're able to send me a reset password and agree I've reset it they won't let me comment using the same, so I can't comment over there/

[nineveh_uk]

I think that hypothetical fraud has to be considered. If it is easy for me to think of ways of making money out of parental leave associated with surrogacy including in circumstances in which there isn’t even a surrogate pregnancy, then other people can too, both people prepared to commit fraud (you could get a lot of money from an employer with a good scheme), and people prepared to use the spectre of it to deprive women of their existing rights.

Where there is actually a formal adoption then the unpaid parental leave followed by adoption leave does work, I think, but this doesn't cover all surrogacy situations, for some of which adoption is not a legal possibility.